
Who wrote this book and when?
Douglas Adams in 1982.
Has there been a film version?
No. It was even rejected as a plotline for the TV series.
Who are the main characters?
Arthur Dent – a man from the late planet Earth who is still coming to terms with being a space hitchhiker
Ford Prefect – a space hitchhiker and Arthur’s friend
Slartibartfast – the award-winning designer of fjords and also on a mission to save the Universe
Trillian – a woman from the late planet Earth, she’s taking care of Zaphod
Zaphod Beeblebrox – the former president of the galaxy, now moping because he has no purpose
What’s it about?
This is mainly a book about time travel in an attempt to save the Universe from total destruction by a race of close-minded extra terrestrials from the planet Krikkit. These aliens have decided to destroy every other race in the Universe to have their sky clear again and have escaped from the time loop prison they were placed in. Now, they’re collecting all the parts to the open the portal to destruction and the only ones who have sense enough to try and stop them are Slartibartfast, Arthur Dent, and occasionally, Ford Prefect. The Universe is in…well, someone’s hands at least…
Why is this book a classic/bestseller?
It’s part of the HHGG series.
Do you recommend I read this book?
Yes.
How did this book make your list?
See the “classic/bestseller” question.
Has it won any awards?
No.
Favorite quotes:
“Arthur’s consciousness approached his body as from a great distance, and reluctantly. It had had some bad times in there. Slowly, nervously, it entered and settled down into its accustomed position.” – p 23
Personal thoughts:
I think this book would have been better for me if I actually understood cricket. The game, I mean. There were so many subtle references and jokes to cricket, I felt I was missing out on half the humor of the novel. But of course, being American puts me at a disadvantage. However, there still were some exceedingly funny parts. I loved that Arthur learned to fly simply by falling and forgetting to hit the ground. And Adams wow-ed me with the creature killed over and over by Dent who wants revenge. But my favorite part of this novel was the return of Slartibartfast. Ever since the big screen made a swipe at telling this story, I’ve thought of Slartibartfast as Bill Nighy – who is a hilarious actor. So picturing Nighy in a bistro comprised of mathematical probabilities and equations was delightful.
I know I said the plot would dissipate more, but this book proves me wrong. The random factor was still there, of course, but I’m not sure if it was toned down or if I am simply growing used to it. Nevertheless, this installment in the series had more of a plot than the previous ones.



Madame Bovary
May 30, 2007 — sarahintheskywithWho wrote this book and when?
It was published as a book in 1857 by Gustave Flaubert.
Has there been a film version?
Several, the most famous one being in 1949.
Who are the important characters?
Emma Bovary – the daughter of a farmer and wife of a doctor, she dreams of an exciting life
Dr. Charles Bovary – Emma’s husband, a staid doctor who wants to be cutting edge
Leon – a young man who loves Emma when they live in the same small town, he eventually moves to Paris
Rodolphe – a libertine who is interested in Emma as one of his mistresses
Lheureux – a merchant who knows how to cater to people’s tastes while enticing them into debt
Homais – an apothecary with a big ego
What’s it about?
This is a story of disillusionment and the search for fulfillment in life. Emma Bovary is a doctor’s wife but she longs for something that feels more real, more deep, more romantic; especially after a decadent ball attended by a dashing viscount. She searches for things to fill up the empty space in her life, whether it is material possessions, a child, love affairs, even religion.
Why is this book a classic/bestseller?
It was one of the first novels to define real life in it’s ugliness – how many people truly were searching for a deeper feeling of reality and fulfillment. It resonated with them and set a standard for the rest of literature even to this day.
Do you recommend I read this book?
Not really; I, personally, think it’s boring.
How did this book make your list?
It’s considered a classic and was one of the banned books.
Has it won any awards?
No.
Favorite quotes:
“It was the beginning of April, when the primroses are in bloom, and a warm wind blows over the flower-beds newly turned, and the gardens, like women, seem to be getting ready for the summer fetes. Through the bars of the arbour and away bwyond, the river seen in the fields, meandering through the grass in wandering curves. The evening vapours rose between the leafless poplars, touching their outlines with a violet tint, paler and more transparent than a subtle gauze caught athwart their branches.” – p 87
“Because lips libertine and venal had murmured such words to him, he believed but little in the candour of hers; exaggerated speeches hiding mediocre affections must be discounted; as if the fullness of the soul did not sometimes overflow in the emptiest metaphors, since no one can ever give the exact measure of his needs, nor of his conceptions, nor of his sorrows; and since human speech is like a cracked tin kettle, which we hammer out tunes to make bears dance when we long to move the stars.” – p 144
“No matter! She was not happy – she never had been. Whence came this insufficiency in life – this instantaneous turning to decay of everything on which she leant?” – p 209
Personal thoughts:
I was saving this book for a special occasion after hearing so many astoundingly wonderful things about it. Nearly everyone who has read it has recommended it – and frankly, I’m horribly disappointed. Which makes me wonder if something is wrong with me and my reading skills. The poetic prose in it, I admit, is gorgeous. Flaubert was an obsessive wordsmith and it shows in his writing. The language itself was great – just the story was lacking.
The longer this book went on, the more depressed I grew and the more I wanted to just read faster to finish it. Everything – from romances to death scenes was drawn out beyond my level of endurance. And I didn’t understand why the book began with Charles’ life and then suddenly switched to Emma’s after their marriage. I think as a modern reader, it’s a little hard for me to grasp the profundity of this work. I appreciate what it’s trying to get across…it’s just…I experience real life every day…why would I want to read a book about it that ends in a thoroughly depressing manner?